57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
16
10
4
4
18
5
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
6.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.8
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2025
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
109
111
40
47
158

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich