57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
4
3
5
5
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
3.3
3.7
2.8
2.2
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
40
36
139
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen