56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Goodyear Efficientgrip CargoPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip Cargo

R14 – R17
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Testprofil
Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
—
3
18
—
—
13
—
Optimale Position
—
#2
#1
—
—
#1
—
Durchschnittliche Position
—
3.7
6.1
—
—
4.3
—
Neuester Test
—
2025
2024
—
—
2025
—
Verfügbare Größen
—
34
47
64
—
123
—

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich