Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Cargo

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Cargo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Anzahl der Tests

1

18

4

3

5

3

26

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

2.0

6.1

12.0

3.7

2.2

3.3

2.2

Neuester Test

2019

2024

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

43

47

111

34

63

40

66

Nass

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Nassbremsen

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Kreisbahn nass

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Aquaplaning - quer

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Handling - nass

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - längs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Komfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Außengeräusch

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Trocken

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

95%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Kilometerstand

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Cargo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen