Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

Ventus Prime 4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Anzahl der Tests

1

13

3

4

3

Optimale Position

#5

#2

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

5.0

6.2

3.3

12.0

3.7

3.3

4.7

Neuester Test

2024

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

—

530

23

111

34

23

126

Nass

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Nassbremsen

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplaning - quer

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

100%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Handling - nass

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

90%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Trocken

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Trockenbremsen

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Handling - trocken

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Komfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

98%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Komfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

95%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

100%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rollwiderstand

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

Ventus Prime 4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen