Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Apollo Alnac 4G gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Alnac 4G

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Alnac 4G

Blizzak LM-005

Anzahl der Tests

—

8

49

Optimale Position

—

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

18.9

3.2

Neuester Test

—

2023

2024

Verfügbare Größen

—

46

213

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Apollo Alnac 4G

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Apollo Alnac 4G

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Apollo Alnac 4G

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Apollo Alnac 4G

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Apollo Alnac 4G

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Apollo Alnac 4G

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Apollo Alnac 4G

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Apollo Alnac 4G

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Apollo Alnac 4G

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Apollo Alnac 4G

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Trockenleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Apollo Alnac 4G

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Apollo Alnac 4G

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Apollo Alnac 4G

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Apollo Alnac 4G

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Apollo Alnac 4G

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Apollo Alnac 4G

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Apollo Alnac 4G

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Apollo Alnac 4G

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Apollo Alnac 4G gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Alnac 4G

Blizzak LM-005

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen