57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
36
23
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.1
3.3
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
303
176
194

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich