56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
3
2
18
3
1
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
1.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
23
47
34
64

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich