57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
4
13
14
24
Optimale Position
#2
#7
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
3.6
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
82
194
302

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
58%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich