57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
36
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
3.1
12.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2023
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
303
111
36

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich