56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
3
21
18
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
6.1
3.7
4.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
164
47
34
126
64

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich