56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Testprofil
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
12.0
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
161
47
111
64
58

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich