57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
18
5
1
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
6.1
4.8
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
47
158
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen