Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Anzahl der Tests

—

21

9

13

Optimale Position

—

#2

#8

Durchschnittliche Position

—

11.9

5.7

13.6

Neuester Test

—

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

—

161

104

146

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen