56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
9
13
18
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
5.7
13.6
6.1
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
161
104
146
47

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich