Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Nokian WetProof

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

EcoControl HP2

WetProof

5.9

R14 – R20

Auch vergleichen mit

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

EcoControl HP2

WetProof

Anzahl der Tests

—

8

14

Optimale Position

—

#4

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

12.8

5.6

Neuester Test

—

2024

2023

Verfügbare Größen

—

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

65%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

63%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

62%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

83%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Nassleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

79%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

74%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

78%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

67%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Trockenleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

71%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

61%

Nokian WetProof

71%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

76%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Nokian WetProof

53%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

Nokian WetProof

69%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

82%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

87%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Nokian WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

EcoControl HP2

WetProof

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen