56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Testprofil
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
13
13
3
Optimale Position
#1
#8
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
13.6
4.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
146
123
34

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich