56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Testprofil

Testprofil
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
49
Optimale Position
#1
#4
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.3
3.2
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
47
97
213

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich