57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
10
14
4
18
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.0
3.6
3.3
6.1
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
40
109
194
40
47

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich