57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
14
15
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
12.0
3.6
9.0
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
111
194
226

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich