55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Testprofil
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
13
3
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
4.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
123
64
34

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich