Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Anzahl der Tests

—

4

—

26

Optimale Position

—

#3

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

12.0

—

2.2

Neuester Test

—

2025

—

2026

Verfügbare Größen

—

111

58

64

66

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen