56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Testprofil
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
13
18
23
3
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.3
6.1
2.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
123
47
66
34

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich