Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

WetProof

Advantage

6.2

R14 – R20

Auch vergleichen mit

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Advantage

Anzahl der Tests

—

14

13

Optimale Position

—

#1

#8

Durchschnittliche Position

—

5.6

13.6

Neuester Test

—

2023

2025

Verfügbare Größen

—

146

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Nokian WetProof

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Advantage

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen