Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

WetProof

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Blizzak 6

Anzahl der Tests

—

14

Optimale Position

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

5.6

3.6

Neuester Test

—

2023

2025

Verfügbare Größen

—

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Nassleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Nokian WetProof

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Nokian WetProof

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Trockenleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Nokian WetProof

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian WetProof

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen