57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Nokian
WetProof
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
5
18
1
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
5.6
2.2
6.1
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
63
47
66

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Nokian WetProof
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nokian WetProof
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich