Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Nokian WetProof

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

ION Evo

Advantage

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen