Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Efficientgrip SUV

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

—

21

3

24

—

Optimale Position

—

#2

#1

—

Durchschnittliche Position

—

11.9

3.7

2.7

—

Neuester Test

—

2024

2025

—

Verfügbare Größen

123

161

34

265

58

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip SUV

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen