Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

Pilot Sport 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Blizzak 6

Anzahl der Tests

—

26

14

Optimale Position

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

2.2

3.6

Neuester Test

—

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

123

—

66

—

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen