56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Gt Radial Fe2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Testprofil
Gt
Radial Fe2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
14
Optimale Position
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
Neuester Test
2026
Verfügbare Größen
146

Nass

Nass
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Nassbremsen
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Handling - nass
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Komfort

Komfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Komfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Außengeräusch
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometerstand
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich