56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Testprofil
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
3
24
Optimale Position
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
64
34
265

Nass

Nass
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Nassbremsen
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Handling - nass
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - quer
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Kilometerstand
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Preis-Wert
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rollwiderstand
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Komfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Außengeräusch
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%

Trocken

Trocken
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Trockenbremsen
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Handling - trocken
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich