56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Testprofil
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
—
18
4
25
—
Optimale Position
—
#1
#3
#1
—
Durchschnittliche Position
—
6.1
12.0
2.2
—
Neuester Test
—
2024
2025
2026
—
Verfügbare Größen
64
47
111
66
—

Nass

Nass
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Handling - nass
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%

Kosten

Kosten
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Komfort

Komfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Komfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Außengeräusch
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich