57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Infinity Ecosis gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Infinity EcosisBudget
InfinityInfinity

Ecosis

R14 – R16
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Infinity
Ecosis
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
10
4
Optimale Position
#9
#8
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.3
13.4
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
25
153
109
40

Nass

Nass
Infinity Ecosis
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Infinity Ecosis
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Infinity Ecosis
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Infinity Ecosis
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Infinity Ecosis
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Infinity Ecosis
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Infinity Ecosis
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Infinity Ecosis
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Infinity Ecosis
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Infinity Ecosis
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Trocken

Trocken
Infinity Ecosis
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Infinity Ecosis
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Infinity Ecosis vs Nexen N blue HD PlusInfinity Ecosis vs Riken Road PerformanceInfinity Ecosis vs Maxxis Mecotra 3Infinity Ecosis vs CST Medallion MD-A1BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich