57 Shops · 184,262+ Produkte

Vergleich: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

1 gemeinsame Tests mit detaillierten Daten

Leistungsvergleich

Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
69%
Kumho
EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Nassbremsen
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Handling - nass
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
63%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
61%
Aquaplaning längs
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Aquaplaning quer
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Komfort und Lärm
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
72%
Kumho
EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
70%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Außengeräusch
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
59%
Innengeräusch
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
80%
Wirtschaft
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
76%
Kumho
EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
80%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kilometerstand
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
70%

Im Vergleich verwendete Tests

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
ADACADAC
Sommer
2019185/65 R15Ansehen

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Allgemeinen Vergleich anzeigen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich