57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Kumho
EcowinG ES01 KH27
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
18
3
Optimale Position
#6
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.8
12.0
6.1
3.7
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
102
111
47
36

Nass

Nass
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich