Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Innengeräusche

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Preis-Wert

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Organisation	Jahreszeit	Jahr	Dimension
ADAC	Sommer	2023	205/55 R16	Ansehen

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Ecsta HS52

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Advantage

e.Primacy

Nass

Komfort

Kosten

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen