56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Testprofil
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
9
21
18
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.7
11.9
6.1
12.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
104
161
47
111
34

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich