56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Testprofil
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
10
21
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
11.9
12.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
104
161
111
34

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich