Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Innengeräusche

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Preis-Wert

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Nass

Komfort

Kosten

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen