57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
10
18
3
4
5
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
4.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
47
36
40
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen