57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.6
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
10
16
3
5
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
5.5
3.7
4.8
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
153
36
158

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich