Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Anzahl der Tests

10

—

14

Optimale Position

#2

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

6.0

—

3.6

Neuester Test

2026

—

2025

Verfügbare Größen

104

—

Nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Nassleistung

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Innengeräusche

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Trockenleistung

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Preis-Wert

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen