Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Innengeräusche

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Preis-Wert

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Nass

Komfort

Kosten

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen