Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Primacy 5

Anzahl der Tests

9

4

—

3

2

Optimale Position

#2

#3

—

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

5.7

12.0

—

3.7

3.5

Neuester Test

2024

2025

—

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

104

111

—

34

126

Nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Primacy 5

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Kosten

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen