Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Testprofil

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

e.Primacy

Anzahl der Tests

15

—

33

4

Optimale Position

#2

—

#1

#3

Durchschnittliche Position

9.0

—

4.1

12.0

Neuester Test

2025

—

2025

Verfügbare Größen

224

—

658

111

Nass

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Nassfahrverhalten

Kumho Ecsta PS71

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Trockenleistung

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Offroad

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Innengeräusche

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Preis-Wert

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

e.Primacy

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Offroad

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen