Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Testprofil

Ecsta PS71

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

Anzahl der Tests

15

4

—

33

Optimale Position

#2

#3

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

9.0

12.0

—

4.1

Neuester Test

2025

—

2025

Verfügbare Größen

224

111

—

658

Nass

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Handling - nass

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Nassbremsen

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Nassfahrverhalten

Kumho Ecsta PS71

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Trocken

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Trockenbremsen

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Handling - trocken

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Trockenleistung

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Offroad

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Außengeräusch

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Komfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Innengeräusche

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Rollwiderstand

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Kilometerstand

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Preis-Wert

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

86%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Ecsta PS71

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Offroad

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen