Vergleich: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Lassa

Competus Winter 2+

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Nass

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Nassbremsen

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

94%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - quer

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

100%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Aquaplaning - längs

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Handling - nass

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schnee

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Schnee-Beschleunigung

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

99%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schnee Handling

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schneetraktion

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Trocken

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Trockenbremsen

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Handling - trocken

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Trockenleistung

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Komfort

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Komfort

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Außengeräusch

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kosten

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rollwiderstand

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Competus Winter 2+

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Nass

Schnee

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen