56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Linglong ComfortMaster gegen Ceat WinterDrive SUV gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Linglong ComfortMasterBudget
LinglongLinglong

ComfortMaster

R13 – R17
Budget
CeatCeat

WinterDrive SUV

7.2
R13 – R
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.2
R14 – R20
Auch vergleichen mit
PremiumContact 7 Turanza T005 Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
Linglong
ComfortMaster
Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
1
1
13
Optimale Position
#8
#3
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
8.0
3.0
13.6
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
92
—
146

Nass

Nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
55%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Handling - nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%

Komfort

Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
90%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
50%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
60%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich