56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Agilis+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
Michelin
Agilis+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
2
Optimale Position
#10
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
34
23

Nass

Nass
Michelin Agilis+
60%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Agilis+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Agilis+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Michelin Agilis+
33%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Agilis+
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Agilis+
61%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Agilis+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Agilis+
94%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Agilis+
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich