55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Nass

Nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Handling - nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Nassbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%

Schnee

Schnee
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich